MP/MLAs in Parliament / Legislative Assembly make the law only in a broad skeletal form. After that, executive make Rules ie minor technical details. This is known as Delegated Legislation / subordinate legislation.
April 2017 – Issue and Parliament’s Recommendation
Issue is – Government doesn’t frame rules and as a result laws passed by Parliament remains inoperational. Eg: Benami Transactions Act which was enacted in 1988 to confiscate Benami properties remains inactive even after 25 years
Parliament has recommended that government should make rules within six months of a law being passed. Process of rule-making should start in parallel with the drafting of the law.
Implementation of these recommendations will ensure that the government cannot bypass the will of Parliament
Advantages of Delegated Legislation
Delegated Legislation is universally recognized and is both desirable and legitimate.
1 . Lack of Time
Parliament and State Legislative assembly (SLA) are too busy with Legislative work .
2. Lack of Expertise
Modern legislation are very
complex dealing with subjects like
IT security, money laundering, clinical research etc.
MP/MLAs cant be expected to
have such a broad knowledge on all subjects .
3. More flexible
Rules / Delegated legislation can be rapidly changed to meet the urgent requirements.
Anti-Arguments of Subordinate Legislation
Administrators/ Bureaucrats
who make rules are not responsible to public => does not take into account interests of people.
Goes against Separation of Power
Parliament does not have
adequate facilities to scrutinize every piece and section of delegated
legislation.
Safeguards
1 . Parliamentary Safeguards
Committee on Subordinate legislation => Checks whether it is inline with parent legislation or not
2. Judicial Safeguards
Judiciary
can declare a delegated legislative acts as “invalid” if
The provisions of subordinate
legislation violates the Constitution
Subordinate legislation is
moving in a different direction than the parent act
3. Public scrutiny
Public can also hold government responsible by keen scrutiny.
2019 : Breach of privilege motion was moved against Prime Minister and Defence Minister claiming they had misled Parliament on the Rafale fighter jet deal issue
2017 : Karnataka assembly Speaker ordered the imprisonment of two journalists for a year based on recommendations of its privilege committees.
2003 : TN Speaker directed arrest of 5 journalists for publishing articles that were critical of AIADMK government
Meaning of Parliamentary Privilege
‘Privilege’ means a special or exceptional right or immunity enjoyed by a particular class of persons
Idea behind parliamentary privileges is that members who represent the people
Should not be obstructed in any way in the discharge of their parliamentary duties
They are able to express their views freely and fearlessly inside the Houses of Parliament
Ensure sovereignty of Parliament .
Collective Privileges
Right to publish its Reports & Proceedings & also
right to prohibit
others from publishing same(44
Amendment – Press can publish true report without permission)
Can hold secret sitting
Can make rules to regulate its own procedures
Right to
receive immediate information about arrest,
detention etc of its member
Courts are prohibited to inquire
into proceedings of House
It can punish members as well as outsiders for
breach of privileges
Individual Privileges
Cannot be arrested during the session and 40 days before the beginning and 40 days after the end of the session .
Freedom of Speech in the Parliament . No member is liable for anything said in Parliament
Exempted from jury service . Can refuse to give evidence and appear as a witness when Parliament is in session .
Breach of Privileges vs Contempt of the house
Any act or omission which
obstructed a House of the Parliament / its Member / its Officer in the performance of their functions or
which has tendency to produce result against the dignity , authority and honour of the House
is treated as Contempt of the House
Breach of
Privilege and Contempt of the House are used interchangeably but may have
different implications
Contempt of the House has wider
implications – It may be a Contempt of the House without
specifically committing a Breach of Privilege
Example : Disobedience to a legitimate order of House is not a
breach of the Privilege but can be a Contempt of the House
Important Cases
Keshav Singh Case , 1965 : Related to committal to prison of Keshav Singh by the UP Vidhan Sabha for committing a breach of privilege and contempt of the House . It was held that Judiciary cant interfere in this.
Searchlight case, 1959 : Supreme Court held that the provisions of Article 194 indicate that Freedom of Speech referred in it is different from the Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a) and cannot be cut down in any way by law contemplated by clause(2) of Article 19.
Need of Codified Act regarding Privileges
There is
need for a law
for codifying the privileges, define the limits of penal action for breach of
privilege and procedures to be followed.
Article 105
(Article 194 for LA) : Privileges and immunities of each House of Parliament
shall be such as may be
defined by Parliament by law, and, until so defined shall be those which
are enjoyed by House of Commons of Britain .
Hence, until now since
separate Law is not there, Parliament enjoys same privileges as that of
House of Commons .
Note : expression ‘until
so defined’ does not mean an absolute power to not define privileges at
all.
Issue :
Indian Parliament is not Supreme while
British Parliament is. Hence, giving same power to
Parliament as that of House of Commons is wrong because
Fundamental Rights of Citizens can be curtailed
other limitations on Parliament cant be applied
Historical reasons : Parliamentary privileges were wrested by
Parliament from King in England. In
India, Privileges were granted by People so that their representatives can
work without any fear
National
Commission to Review the Working of Constitution (NCRWC) , 2nd
Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC)& All India Whips has also recommended that the
privileges of legislatures should be defined by law.
Australia
passed Parliamentary Privileges Act in 1987, clearly defining privileges, the
conditions of their breach and consequent penalties.
Following steps can be taken to increase the effectiveness of Parliament :-
1 . Role of Parliamentary Committees
Parliamentary Committees are kind of mini parliament in itself .
Larger number of bills should be referred to Parliamentary Committees as its membership is representative of Parliament .
2. Increasing Plenary Time
Parliament is supposed to meet roughly 100 days per year but significant portion of that time is lost to parliamentary obstructionism . Data shows that number of working days have decreased
140 days a year in the 1950s
65 days over the past five years.
NCRWC Recommendation : provision of 100 obstruction free days for parliamentary working can be made mandatory by law (each obstruction free day is defined as 5hour/day)
3. Parliament Budget Office (PBO)
A Parliamentary Budget Office (akin to the US Congressional Budget Office)would help MPs provide effective oversight.
4. Shadow Cabinet
Under such a system, opposition MPs track a certain portfolio, scrutinize its performance and suggest alternate programs.
5. e-petition System
Under this system, If 10 lakh people sign a petition , PM or minister concerned will have to reply to it.
6. Tackling delegated legislation
There is committee on
Subordinate Delegation
Parliament has made this committee to assure that Delegated Legislation are in broad conformity with Legislation .
This Committee need to be strengthened.
7. Role of Speaker
Speakers have failed spectacularly wrt upholding the rules of parliamentary conduct & punishing errant MPs
8. Increasing Women Representation
Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha
have not seen women MPs cross the 15% mark.
Passage of the Women’s
Reservation Bill (108th amendment) reserving 33% of all seats
in Parliament and State legislatures for women.
In 17th Lok Sabha , 78 MPs ie 14.6 % of total MPs were women & figure in Rajya Sabha was 12.7%.
The increase in women representation is relatively small
Even profile of women MPs reveals a distinctive bend towards Middle Class Professionals or Political Families with little/no links with women’s movements.
Why we need women in Politics ?
To achieve the goal of Equality and Justice + India has signed CEDAW which includes discrimination in political field.
Studies have shown that women are better decision makers , more empathetic towards weaker sections etc
To represent needs of women in better way and make gender sensitive laws and policies
What can be done to improve their numbers ?
33% Reservation in Lok Sabha
seats (such step in Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) have shown good
results)
Start schemes to inculcate
leadership qualities in women. Like Nai
Roshani scheme
for Minority women.
Improve access to education to
work
OBCs
Post Mandal => 1980-90s
=> Powerful backward class
movement led to the rise of regional parties like SP , RJD etc.
Significant increase in
representation of OBC MPs within Parliament
Religious Minorities
Muslims remained very less represented
Age Structure
Lok Sabha is getting older.
Number of members aged 70 and above are increasing.
MPs in the age group of 25 to 40 have declined from 26% to 13% from 1st to 16th Lok Sabha
Irony is India has young population in the world represented by aged in the parliament
There is debate regarding question that what is the level of sovereignty enjoyed by the Parliament of India?
Unlike British Parliament , Indian Parliament is not supreme (sovereignty lies with people) . It has following limits on its sovereignty.
1 . Written Constitution
Parliament had to operate within the limits
prescribed by the Constitution
In Britain –
Constitution is not written &
there is nothing like fundamental law of the land
2. Federal System of Government
Division of sovereignty between Center and States
In Britain – Unitary government & all powers with the center
3. System of Judicial Review
Adoption of Independent judiciary with power of the Judicial Review restricts the supremacy of the parliament
4. Fundamental Rights
Article 13 prohibits State from making
a law that either takes away totally or abrogates in part a Fundamental Right
Britain – no
codification of justiciable Fundamental Rights in constitution
In this regard , Indian Parliament is similar to the American legislature . But Indian Constitution is more sovereign than US Constitution because in India there is Procedure Established by Law unlike US where there is Due Process of Law
Equality of seats among States in the Rajya Sabha is a
principle, which found a great deal of acceptance in the Constituent Assembly.
However, it could not be adopted because of the circumstances prevailing at
that time. Is there a need to look afresh at this?
Answer: In India, the allocation of seats to be filled by the representatives of States in the Council of States is done in proportion to the population of State.
Constituent Assembly was in
favour of equal representation of all states in Rajya Sabha. In spite of
that, equal representation was not adopted because at that time the States of Indian Union were not
independent entities having pre-existing rights or powers.
As Sarkaria Commission pointed out
Nine States in India have just one member
each in the Rajya Sabha
2/3 majority ( for Constitutional Amendment) = top 7 states & nominated members.
Punchhi Commission also endorsed equality of
representation
All the Federal Polities give equal
representation to states irrespective of
size and population . Eg US = 2 members per state in Senate .
But the problem
is that in
the era of coalition politics, the interests of parties take precedence over
the interests of the States.
So there are concerns whether even after
giving equal representation, the behaviour of representatives of those States
in the council will be according to the interests of State and not interests of their party.
Side note : Two special powers with Rajya Sabha
Art 249
Can authorise Parliament to make laws on
subject in State list (2/3 votes)
Art 312
Can authorise Parliament to create
new All India Service (2/3 votes)
Importance of Rajya Sabha and Should it be removed
Article deals with important debate in Indian polity ie Importance of Rajya Sabha and Should it be removed ?
Importance of Rajya Sabha
Federal
Chamber
Strong
ideological role to play in Federal polity of India => representatives of each state represent and protect interest of their states
Revising
Chamber
As a
Second Chamber, it has the mandate to secure a second sober look at hasty legislation.
Deliberative
Chamber
– Rajya Sabha takes pride in the quality of debates it has held ever since its inception. – 12 Members noted for their contribution to literature, science, art and social service are nominated to RS
Chamber
of Continuity
Rajya
Sabha is a permanent Chamber, not subject to dissolution which is needed in a Parliamentary System
to meet the legislative and constitutional contingency at a time when the
popularly elected House may be under dissolution
Representation
to eminent members
Provides for representation of eminent society
members via nomination who otherwise may not participate in
elections.
Arguments for removing Rajya Sabha
It stalls progress. Same point was raised by Professor Shibban Lal Saksena in Constitutional Assembly.
Rajya Sabha has become parking spot for politicians not able to win their Lok Sabha
seats.
Considered to be a delaying house, which prolongs
the bill passing procedure.
Seats are bought and votes are sold vitiating the whole political
atmosphere because of the limited
electoral base.
Allotment of seats in Rajya Sabha to states on
the basis of population & which is against
Federal principles. Control over few big states is more than enough to
scuttle the voice of numerous smaller states .
Side Topic : Why certain powers not given to Rajya Sabha?
Rajya
Sabha is elected by the MLAs and not directly by the people. Therefore, Constitution stopped short of giving certain
powers to the Rajya Sabha. Members of
Lok Sabha are directly elected by the
people and they are given the crucial
powers of removing a government and controlling the finances.
This article deals with ‘Parliament – Legislative Procedure in Parliament .’ This is part of our series on ‘Polity’ which is important pillar of GS-2 syllabus . For more articles , you can click here
Legislative Procedure in Parliament
Legislative procedures same in both the houses.
Bills are of two kind – Public Bill & Private Bill
1 . Public Bill
Introduced by
Minister
Reflects policies of government
Greater
chance of approval
Its rejection can lead to No Confidence Motion
Requires 7 days notice
Drafted by
concerned Department with help of Law Ministry
2. Private Bill
Introduced by
any
Member
Reflect stand
of opposition party
Lesser chance
of approval
No such
implication on its rejection
Requires one month notice
Responsibility
of member concerned
It is very difficult to get Private Bill Passed
Only 14 private member’s bills have been passed
in Parliament’s history and last one of them was in 1970 . This was the Supreme Court
(Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Bill, 1968.
Bills can also be classified in other way
Ordinary Bill
Concerned with any matter other
than financial
Money Bill
Concerned with financial matters
like taxation, public expenditure
Financial Bill
Concerned with financial matters
but different from Money Bill
Constitutional Amendments
Seeks to amend the Constitutional Provisions
1 . Ordinary Bill
Introduced by
Any Member
Introduced in
Any House
Stages to pass
5 in each House
First Reading
Bill is introduced by reading its Title and Objective
Published in gazette of India
Second Reading
Has three substages
Stage of GeneralDiscussion
– Printed copies of bill are distributed to all members – Principles of Bill & its Provisions are discussed generally but details are not discussed and then referred to Select Committee or Joint Committee .
CommitteeStage
– Usual practice is to send it to Select Committee – Committee examines the Bill thoroughly & in detail, clause by clause – It can amend Provision but without altering principles underlying it .
Consideration Stage
– House considers Provisions of Bill clause by clause – Each clause is discussed and voted upon separately – Amendment can be done here.
Third Reading
In this Stage, Bill should be accepted or rejected in full and no amendments are allowed
If Bill is passed by Majority, then it goes to other house
Bill in Second House
In other House, it goes
through all three readings and then put to vote
There are possibilities
Possibility
Result
May pass the Bill
Deemed to be passed & send to President
1. May Reject it 2. Mayn’t take any decision for 6 months 3. May pass it with Amendment and return to 1st House for reconsideration . But 1st house Rejects proposed Amendments
– Results in Deadlock – To resolve Joint Sitting of two houses and bill put to vote – If passed by Simple Majority, then it is deemed to be passed
Assent of President
After it is passed by both Houses , it is sent to President for its
approval and President has three options
May give Assent to it
Bill becomes Act
May withhold his Assent
It ends and not becomes Act.
May send it back for
reconsideration
If both Houses again pass it with or without Amendment, he has to
give his assent – Suspensive
Veto
Joint Sittings
A deadlock is deemed to have taken place after a bill has been passed by one
House and transmitted to the other House
if the bill is rejected by
the other House;
If Second House pass it with
Amendment and return to 1st House for reconsideration . But 1st house
Rejects proposed Amendments
If other house doesn’t take
any decision for more than six
months
In the above three situations, the President can summon both the Houses to
meet in a joint sitting for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the bill.
Joint Sitting is applicable
to
Ordinary bills or
financial bills only
And not to
Money bills : Lok Sabha has overriding powers
Constitutional amendment bills : bill must
be passed by each House separately.
Speaker of
Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting
Quorum : one-tenth of
the total number
of members of two Houses.
Governed by the Rules of Procedure of Lok Sabha and not of Rajya Sabha.
If the bill in dispute is
passed by a majority of the total number of members of both the Houses
present and voting in the joint sitting, the bill is deemed to have been
passed by both the Houses.
So far Joint Session was conducted for 3 times.
Dowry Prohibition Bill 1960
Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill, 1977
Prevention of Terrorism Bill 2002 (POTA)
2. Money bills
Prerequisite about Money Bill
Article 110: Defines what is Money Bill
It relates only (6 matters) to following things
Imposition, abolition ,alteration or regulation of any of the tax
Borrowing of money by Union government
Custody of Consolidated Fund & Contingency Fund
Appropriation of money out of Consolidated Fund
Declaration of any expenditure charged on Consolidated fund of India
Receipt of money on account of Consolidated Fund of India or Public Account of India
Money bill should contain only matters listed under article 110 (1). If a bill is a combination of any of the above and some other provisions not incidental to those matters, it cannot be called a Money Bill
Who decides
Speaker of Lok Sabha (& not challengeable)
Our Constitution follows the British procedure . However, there is a key difference. House of Commons appoints two senior members who must be consulted before the Speaker gives the certificate. In India, the Speaker makes the decision on her/his own.
Introduced in
Lok Sabha only
Introduced by
Minister only with permission of
President
Introduced in Lok Sabha (only) . Then pass through first three readings (same as Ordinary Bill) and after passing moved to Rajya Sabha
Rajya Sabha has very limited Power
Can’t reject
or amend bill ,can only make
recommendations.
Lok Sabha can accept recommendation or pass it otherwise and then Bill
send to President for assent
Should pass
bill within 14 days. If not , Bill is deemed to
be passed
Due to lesser power of Rajya Sabha wrt Money Bill, when ruling party doesn’t enjoy majority in
Rajya Sabha, they try to label Bill as Money Bill to circumvent Rajya Sabha.
President also has limited power and can
Give Assent
to Bill – Generally this happens
because Bill is introduced with his prior permission
May not take
any decision
But cant send back Bill for reconsideration
Issue : Circumventing Upper House through Money Bill Strategy
Recently Opposition alleged
that Government was
eroding Legislative Powers
of Rajya Sabha
by deliberately introducing
crucial bills as Money
Bills.
2017 Budget : Government brought
about 40
amendments through Money Bill Route ,
many of which are related to several other laws like
Merging eight tribunals and
the changing of rules for appointments
Remove the cap of 7.5 % of
net profits for corporates to donate to political parties
Give greater powers to tax
officials
2016: Important bills like Aadhar
Bill, 2016 was
labelled as Money Bill.
However, the Constitution
makes it abundantly
clear that Money
bills should contain
only 6 matters
listed under article 110
(1). If a
bill is a combination of
any of the
above and some
other provisions not incidental to
those matters, it cannot
be called a
money bill.
Speaker,
while certifying a
bill as Money
Bill, is in
effect depriving the
Rajya Sabha of
its Legislative Power to
disapprove a Bill. There
is no remedy
lying with Rajya
Sabha
Mohd Saeed Siddiqui vs State of UP (2014) :Supreme Court => decision
of Speaker “that Bill in question is Money Bill is final ”.
But
Constitution Bench in Raja Ram Pal v. Hon’ble Speaker, Lok
Sabha (2007), ruled that SC can interfere when Speaker’s choice is grossly illegal
3. Financial Bills
Deals with
fiscal matters i.e. Revenue & Expenditure
Financial Bill(1)
Art117(1)
Financial Bill(2)
Art117(3)
Money Bill is also Financial Bill but because of importance of
those matters other category is given to them
Financial Bill(1)
What
Bills that not only contains matters related to Article 110 but some other matters too
Similarity
To Money bill
– Can be introduced only in Lok Sabha – Can be introduced only on recommendation of President
Similarity
To Ordinary
Bill
– Can be rejected or amended by Rajya Sabha – In case of deadlock Joint Sitting can be called President can send it back for reconsideration
Financial Bill(2)
What
Relating to provisions
involving Consolidated Fund not mentioned in Article 110
Special Features
It can’t be passed by either House
of Parliament unless President has recommended to House for consideration of
Bill
Other features
Rest all features similar to Ordinary
Bill
4. Budget in Parliament
Term Budget is nowhere mentioned in
constitution
Mentioned
term is Annual Financial
Statement (Article 112)
Article 112 of Constitution deals with it
Budget contains following
Estimates
of Revenue & Capital Receipts
Ways &
means to raise Revenue
Estimates of Expenditure
Details of Actual
Receipts & Expenditure of closing years & reasons for Deficit or Surplus
Economic
& Financial policy of coming year i.e taxation ,spending program etc
Earlier , Government of India
used to present two Budgets
Railway budget
Presented by Railway Minister
General budget
By Finance Minister
Separation was done in 1921 on recommendations of Acworth Committee Report (British legacy). But , two Budgets were again merged into one in 2017 by NDA Government.
Constitutional Provisions regarding Budget
President shall lay before Houses of Parliament estimated
receipts & expenditure every financial year
No Demand for Grant shall be made except in recommendation of President
No money shall be withdrawn
from Consolidated Fund except under Appropriation made by Law
No tax shall be levied or
collected except by Authority of Law
Estimates of Expenditure embodied in Budget shall show separately Expenditure
Charged on Consolidated Fund
& Expenditure
made from Consolidated Fund
Budget shall distinguish expenditure on Revenue Account
from other Expenditure
Charged Expenditure on Consolidated Fund
Following consist of Charged Expenditure
Emolument
and Allowances of President, Vice President , Deputy Chairman of RS,
Speaker & Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha,
CAG , Members of UPSC
Salaries ,
Allowances & Pension of Judges of Supreme Court + Pensions of Judges of High Courts
Any sum
required to satisfy any Judgement ,decree or award of any Court or
Tribunal
Any
expenditure declared by
Parliament to be
Charged
(Note : Salary of Governor is not Charged on Consolidated Fund)
Stages in enactment of Bill
Stage 1 : Presentation of the Budget
Budget is presented by Finance Minister on first working day of February with the Budget Speech in Lok Sabha. Then, laid before Rajya Sabha which can only discuss it and has no power to vote on Demand for Grants
Stage 2 : General Discussion
Begins a few
days after its presentation
In both the
Houses of Parliament
Lasts for 3-4
days
Lok
Sabha can discuss the Budget as a
whole or on any question of principle involved . BUT
No Cut Motion can be moved
Budget cannot be submitted to Vote
of the House
Stage 3 : Scrutiny by Departmental Committees
When General discussion is over , Houses are adjourned for 3-4 weeks . 24 Departmental Standing Committees of Parliament examine and discuss in detail Demand for Grants for the concerned Ministers and prepare reports . Reports are then submitted to both houses for consideration
Note : Standing Committee System introduced in 1993, expanded in 2004 . It makes Parliamentary Financial control over the Ministries much more detailed , close , in depth and comprehensive
Stage 4 : Voting on Demands for grants
Lok Sabha
takes up voting on Demand for Grant . Presented ministry wise . Demand becomes
Grant only after it has been duly voted.
Important points :
Voting in Demand for Grant is the exclusive power of LS . RS has no
power .
Voting
is confined to the votable part of the Budget . Expenditure Charged on
Consolidated Fund of India is not submitted to vote . It can
only be discussed.
Cut Motions
Members of Parliament can discuss the details of the Budget and can
also move Motions to
reduce any demand. Three such Cut Motions
Policy Cut Motion
– Represents the disapproval of the policy underlying the demand – States that amount of the demand be reduced to ₹ 1
Economy cut motion
Represents that amount of the demand be reduced by a specified amount
( which may be either lump sump reduction in the demand or omission or
reduction of an item in the demand )
Token cut motion
Reduces the amount of demand by ₹ 100 , ventilating a specific grievance that is within the sphere of
responsibility of the GoI
Conditions to be satisfied the cut motion
Relate to one demand only
Be clearly expressed . No
arguments or defamatory statements
Confined to one matter only
No suggestions for amendment
or repeal of existing laws
Not refer to matter that is
not of primary concern to Union government
Not relate to expenditure
charged on Consolidated Fund of India
Not relate to matter under
adjudication by the court
Not raise a question of
Privilege
Not revive a matter on which
discussion has already taken place in same session
Significance of the cut motion
Concentrated
discussion of specific demand for grant
Upholding the
principle of responsible government by probing the activities of the
government
Not of much utility in practice
Only moved
and discussed in the house
Not passed as
government enjoys the majority support
Their passage in Lok Sabha amount to want of Parliamentary confidence in government and may lead to resignation
In total 26 days for voting on demands => on last day speaker puts all the remaining demands to vote and disposes them whether discussed or not => GUILLOTINE
Stage 5 : Passing of the Finance Bill
Finance Bill is introduced to give effect to the Financial Proposals of Government of India for the following year
Unlike Appropriation bill , amendments can be moved in case of Finance bill
Finance Act legalises the income side of the budget and completes the process of settlement of the budget
Sessions of Parliament and Parliamentary Proceedings
This article deals with ‘Parliament – Sessions of Parliament and Parliamentary Proceedings .’ This is part of our series on ‘Polity’ which is important pillar of GS-2 syllabus . For more articles , you can click here
Sessions of Parliament
By convention, Parliament meets for three sessions in a year:
Budget session which is held towards the beginning of the year,
Three-week Monsoon session (July-August)
Winter session (November-December).
Constitutional Provision : Article 85 only requires
that there should not be a gap of
more than six months between two parliamentary sessions. The same applies to state
legislatures.
Terms related to Sessions of Parliament
1 . Summoning
President summon both the Houses from
time to time
But there can’t be more than 6 months between two meetings
Side Note – Only President can summon Houses on
recommendation of Prime Minister. In order to increase the Parliamentary
Control over Executive, there is need to Amend Constitution to empower President
to convene a session of Parliament on a request of a specified number of MPs. UK & USA too has such provisions
2. Adjournment
There are two sittings in a day
Morning
11-1
Post Lunch
2-6
Adjournment suspends the sitting for specific
time which may be hours or days or weeks
Done by Presiding Officer of the House
3. Adjournment Sine die
Termination
of sittings of Parliament for indefinite
time
Done by Presiding
Officer of the House
4. Prorogation
Within few
days after Sine Die ,President issues notification for Prorogation of the session and it
terminates the session
President can
Prorogue the house while in session
5. Dissolution
Rajya Sabha is
Permanent House only Lok Sabha is subject to dissolution
Dissolution
ends the very life of existing house & new house is to be constituted
after general elections.
Can happen in
two cases
Automatic
dissolution on expiry of its tenure after 5 years
When
President decides to dissolves the House
Position of bills wrt Dissolution of Lok Sabha
Lapse
– Bill pending in Lok Sabha (introduced in Lok Sabha and pending there or introduced in Rajya Sabha & passed by it and pending in Lok Sabha) – Bill passed by Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha (Only these two. All other bills don’t Lapse)
Doesn’t lapse
– Bill doesn’t passed by both houses due to disagreement and notified by President for Joint sitting – Bill pending in Rajya Sabha but not passed by Lok Sabha – Passed by both Houses but doesn’t received assent of President – Bill passed by both houses but returned by President for reconsideration
6. Quorum
Minimum
number of members required for transacting any business in house
1/10 of total
strength
Lok Sabha
55
Rajya Sabha
25
7. Voting in House
All matters
in both the houses decided by Simple
Majority
Only special
matters specifically mentioned in the Constitution decided by using
Special Majority or Absolute Majority
8. Language in Parliament
Hindi & English is language of House
Member can
address in his mother tongue taking permission of
Presiding Officer
In both
Houses , there is arrangement for simultaneous translation
9. Rights of ministers & Attorney general
All Ministers and Attorney General of India
has right to speak & take part in proceedings of either House
& Joint Sittings
And also in any committee of Parliament of which he is not a member
but without right to vote in both cases
10 . Lame duck session
Last session
of existing Lok Sabha after new house is elected
Members of
Lok Sabha which don’t get elected to next house are called Lame Ducks
Devices of Parliamentary Proceedings
Question Hour (11-12)
First hour of sitting is for this
Members ask
questions and Ministers answers them usually
Three types of questions
Starred Questions
– Requires oral answer – Supplementary questions can follow
Unstarred Questions
– Requires written answer – Supplementary questions cant follow – In Star & Unstarred , notice has to be given 15 days in advance
Short Notice Question
– Asked by giving a short notice less than 10 days – Required to be answered orally
Zero Hour (12-1)
Not
mentioned in rule of books, an Indian invention ,in practice
since 1962
Time between
Question hour & the agenda of day
Members can raise
matters in it without prior notice
Motions
No discussion in Parliament can take place without Motion with consent of Presiding officer of house
Fall into three categories
Substantive Motion
– Deals with most important matters like Impeachment of President
Substitute Motion
– Moved in substitution of an original motion & seeks alternate to it – It supersedes original motion
Subsidiary Motion
– In itself has no meaning and is made in reference to original motion.
– Three subcategories 1. Ancillary motion : Regular way of proceeding with various kinds of business 2. Superseding motion : Moved in course of debate on other issue and seeks to supersede that issue 3. Amendment : It modifies or substitute part of original motion
Closure Motion
Moved by member to cut short debate on matter
It is of four kinds
Simple Closure
When matter is sufficiently discussed
Closure byCompartment
– When Bill is lengthy it is divided into parts – Debate covers part as whole & put to vote
Kangaroo closure
Only some clauses taken for debate & voting & other
clauses are skipped and deemed to be passed
Guillotine closure
When undiscussed clauses are put
to vote along with discussed ones due
to warrant of time
Privilege Motion
Concerned
with breach of Parliamentary privileges by Minister
Purpose is to
censure the concerned Minister
Calling Attention Motion
Indian
innovation but mentioned in Rules of Procedure & in existence since
1954
Introduced by
Member to call attention of Minister to matter of urgent importance & seek authoritative statement from him
Doesn’t
involve any discussion / voting
Minister may
make a brief statement about the matter or he may ask for time to make a
statement later
Adjournment Motion
Draw attention of House to urgent matter of public concern & need support of 50 members. It is extraordinary device as interrupts ordinary business
Censure against government & hence cant be introduced in Rajya Sabha
Discussion should be atleast 2.5 hours
No-Confidence Motion
Article 75: Ministers are Collectively Responsible to Parliament
Lok Sabha can
remove Ministry by passing it & need
support of 50 to introduce
Needn’t state reason for its introduction & council of
ministers must resign after this
Only one such motion can be
moved in 6 months
The matter is
taken up for discussion within 10 days of notice .
Rajya Sabha has no role
to play in No Confidence Motion
Censure Motion
Can be moved only in the Lok Sabha & by the opposition of the House
Can be moved against particular Minister or Council of Ministers and reason need to be mentioned
Moved for Censuring specific policies of government. But if the Censure Motion is passed , Council of Minister is bound to seek confidence of Lok Sabha as early as possible
Minister needn’t resign after this
Signed notice must be given by atleast 50 members .
Motion of Thanks
Motion which follows the President address to Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha after General Election and first session of each Financial year
Equivalent to SPEECH FROM THRONE in Britain
Then put to
vote & must be passed.
If lapses in Lok Sabha , considered
defeat of government
No day yet named motion
Motion
admitted to Speaker but date to discuss it not yet fixed
Speaker fix
that after discussion with Leader of House
Point of Order
Member can
move it when proceedings of
House don’t follow normal rules
Extra ordinary device as suspend proceedings & raised by opposition member
mostly
Half an hour Discussion
Speaker can
allot three days a week for this
Meant for discussing matter of public importance which
has gone through enough discussion but answer to which needs elucidation
on matter of fact
Short duration Discussion
Also called
two hour discussion
Members can
raise discussions on matter of public importance in this
Special Mention
Matter which
cant be raised in any motion. Can be raised in Rajya Sabha by special
mention motion
Lok Sabha
equivalent of this is NOTICE
Resolutions
To draw attention of house on matter of public
importance
All
Resolutions come under category of
substantive motion
( only important matters)
Discussion on
this must be strictly relevant to & in scope of resolution
Issue : Low number of Parliamentary Sittings
Data to support this
Parliament sittings have
reduced from
140 days/year at time of Independence
65 days/year presently
State Legislatures= 29
days a year on
average.
Dec 2018 : Winter Session of Punjab LA was of just 3 days .
Need of adequate number of Parliamentary sittings
Good quality of legislations after proper
discussion : Due to lesser number of sittings , laws
are not properly discussed which create problems later
Increase Executive Accountability to Legislature
Consequences of low number of sittings
Compromised legislative business – It results in hasty passage of bills, frequent resort to Ordinances and budgets without due debate. Eg : Over the years, the time spent on discussing the Budget has reduced from an average of 125 hours in the 1950s to 40 hours in the last decade.
Undermines legitimacy of Parliament
Compromised Accountability of Executive to Legislature
Lack of avenues available to MPs to express dissent culminating in MPs disrupting proceedings of Parliament.
Undermining Separation of Power
Large scale promulgation of Ordinances.
Ways to address this
Dilute the power of the government to be the
sole decider of session dates. There is urgent
need to Amend Constitution to
empower President to convene a session of Parliament on a request of a
specified number of MPs
National Commission to Review the Working of the
Constitution (NCRWC) has recommended the minimum number of sittings for Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha be fixed at 120 and
100 respectively.
Odisha has already shown the way, mandating minimum 60 days for
the State Assembly.
System of Annual Calendar of sittings based on deliberation by all
parties as is prevalent in UK.
Issue : Large number of Disruptions
Reasons
Winner takes all approach of Ruling Parties : Parliamentary System works on Consensus building and Give & Take
Low number of Sittings : MPs don’t get time to raise concerns of their constituency
Opening up of Parliament to live telecasts has increased the incentives for groups of MPs disrupt Parliament for particular issue , knowing well that it will be widely covered
Stand of Political Parties : In previous Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition Sushma Swaraj said on record that Parliamentary Disruptions are also legitimate way of showing displeasure with Government’s policies.
This article deals with ‘Parliament – Presiding Officers and Leaders in Parliament .’ This is part of our series on ‘Polity’ which is important pillar of GS-2 syllabus . For more articles , you can click here
Presiding Officers
There are following Presiding Officers in the Parliament
Lok Sabha
Speaker &
Deputy Speaker
Rajya Sabha
Chairman & Deputy Chairman
1 . Speaker of Lok Sabha
Election of Lok Sabha
Elected by members of Lok Sabha from among themselves.
Tenure of Lok Sabha
Generally holds
office during life of Lok Sabha
Has to vacate
his office in following conditions
He ceases to be
member of Lok Sabha
He resigns writing to Deputy Speaker
Removed by resolution passed by Absolute Majority of Lok Sabha
(Exact wording – Speaker may be removed from his office by
a resolution of the Assembly passed by a majority of all the then members of the Assembly)
When Lok
Sabha is dissolved, Speaker don’t vacate his office and continues till
newly elected Lok Sabha meets.
Powers of Lok Sabha
He maintains order & decorum of the house
He is final interpreter of provisions of constitution & rules of procedure wrt Lok Sabha.
He adjourns the house or suspends it in absence of Quorum
He presides over the Joint Sitting of two Houses of Parliament
He can allow secret sitting of house on request of Leader of the house
He decides whether bill is Money Bill or not and his decision is final
He decides the question of disqualification of Lok Sabha arising out of provisions of 10th Schedule .
He appoints Chairman to the Parliamentary Committees & himself is chairman of Business Advisory Committee, Rules Committee & General Purpose Committee
Independence & Impartiality of Lok Sabha
Provided with security of tenure & can be removed only by Absolute Majority
Salaries and allowances charged on Consolidated Fund of India
His work & conduct can’t be discussed or criticized in Lok Sabha
His powers of regulating house are not subject to judicial review
He cant cast vote at first instance and cast vote only in case of tie
Given high position in order of precedence(7 equal to Chief Justice of India)
2. Deputy Speaker
Also elected by Lok Sabha . His election
occurs after election of Speaker
His tenure
terms are same as that of Speaker
He performs
all the duties of Speaker when Speaker is absent
His position is not subordinate to Speaker & he is
directly responsible to Parliament
Special Privilege whenever he is appointed as member of Parliamentary committee, he
automatically becomes its Chairman
When Speaker
presides over the House, he acts as ordinary member of House
Panel of Chairpersons
Speaker nominates
from Lok
Sabha,
not more than 10 members as Panel of Chairpersons and when both Speaker
& Deputy are absent , anybody from
them can act as Speaker
But when
office of both Speaker & Deputy are vacant,
then Speaker’s duty is performed by
such person appointed by President.
Speaker Pro tem
Speakers Office don’t fall vacant with dissolution of Lok Sabha but just before the first meeting of new house
When new house meet for first time, house is Presided by Speaker Pro Tem, who by convention is seniormost member in house and functions are
Administer oath to new members
Enables house to elect new Speaker
Notes
By Convention, Speaker and Deputy Speakers are from following parties
Speaker
From Ruling Party
Deputy Speaker
From Opposition Party
First Speaker and Deputy Speakers were as follows
Speaker
GV Mavlankar
Deputy speaker
A Ayyangar
Analysis : Partisan role played by Speakers (of Legislative Assembly & Lok Sabha)
Partisan roles played by the Speaker
In Uttarakhand case, disqualified rebel members to change composition of the house to enable Government survive No Confidence Motion
Suspension of all the principal opposition parties in the legislative assembly of Gujarat and TN
Role in Anti-Defection Law
Speaker acts as Tribunal in deciding matters of disqualification under Defection
Due to this, Speakers keep on sitting on files and don’t decide the matter in case of defection by Opposition Legislators. This happened in Telangana, AP etc
Deciding Ordinary Bills as Money Bills as happened in various cases like Aadhar Act.
Changes required wrt powers of Speaker
Powers under
Schedule 10 should be transferred to Election Commission of India
After getting elected as
Speaker, he/she must resign from
the party membership as practiced in matured democracies like UK. Also, his
constituency should go uncontested in the next general election.
3. Chairman of Rajya Sabha
Vice President of India is ex-officio Chairman of Rajya Sabha
During any
period he acts as President, he don’t perform this duty
While
presiding Rajya Sabha, he has same
powers as Speaker excluding
He cant
decide whether Bill is Money Bill or Ordinary Bill
Can’t
preside over Joint Sitting
Unlike Speaker , Chairman is not member of Rajya
Sabha
He cant vote
in first instance but can vote in case of tie
His salary
and allowance are charged on consolidated fund of India
4. Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha
Elected by Rajya Sabha from among
themselves
Has to vacate
his office in following conditions
He ceases to be
member of Rajya Sabha
He resigns
writing to Chairman
Removed by
resolution passed by Absolute Majority of Rajya Sabha
He performs
all the duties of Chairman when Chairman
is absent
His position is not
subordinate to Chairman & he is directly responsible to Rajya Sabha
When Chairman
presides the house, he acts as ordinary member of Rajya Sabha
Panel of Vice – Chairpersons
Chairman nominates
from Rajya
Sabha, members as Panel of Vice-Chairpersons
and when both Chairman & deputy are absent anybody from them can act
as Speaker
But when
office of both Chairman & Deputy are vacant, then Chairman’s duty are
performed by such person appointed by President
Leaders in Parliament
1 . Leader of House
Not mentioned
in Constitution but Rules of Houses
Leader of House means Prime Minister if he is
member of Lok Sabha or any Minister appointed by him to function as
Leader of House
Rajya Sabha too has
leader of House like Lok Sabha
USA
equivalent of Majority Leader
2. Leader of Opposition
Not mentioned
in Constitution but Rules of Houses
Leader of the largest opposition
party not having
less than 1/10 of the total
strength of house
Both Rajya Sabha & Lok
Sabha has this office
1969: Office
created &1977 : Given
Statutory Status
Entitled to
Salary, Allowances& Facilities equivalent to Cabinet Minister
Minute
version of Shadow Cabinet of Britain & US equivalent of Minority
Leader
3. Whip
Neither Constitutional nor in rules of Houses but purely Conventional office
He communicates the decision of the party leader to the members and the opinion of the party members to the party leader.
Members are supposed to follow the directives given by the Whip. Failing to do so can invite disciplinary actions like disqualification from party membership or expulsion under the Anti Defection Law.
Significance of Whip
Stability of Government: by ensuring favourable voting during passage of bills and motions
Ensuring Attendance in Parliament for widespread discussion on important issues.
Problems
Restricted internal democracy of the party
Against the Constitutional Philosophy : Individual members are
not allowed to represent their individual views or views of the people of their
constituency.
It creates a ‘forced consensus’
Poor Quality of Debates: legislators are not allowed to dissent
on important issue from party line.
Way forward
Issuance of a whip could be limited to only those bills that could threaten the survival of a government, such as money bills or
no-confidence motions.
Notes : In USA, party whip’s role is to gauge how many legislators
are in support of a bill and how many are opposed to it — and to the extent
possible, persuade them to vote according to the party line on the issue