Extension Services (Agricultural Inputs)

Extension Services (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Extension Services (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


Extension Services are expert services provided to the farmers that can help improve productivity by delivering timely advisory services to farmers to adopt best practices, technology, meet with contingencies, market information etc.

Explanation:  Imagine a small farmer in Bihar growing wheat. He wants to increase yield but:

  • Doesn’t know about the latest high-yielding wheat varieties
  • Isn’t aware of how much fertilizer to use or when to irrigate
  • Doesn’t know how to deal with pest attacks or a sudden drought
  • Has no idea where he’ll get the best price for his wheat in the market

👉 That’s where Extension Services come in. These are expert advisory services provided to farmers by the government or agricultural institutions to help them do farming in a smarter, more scientific, and more profitable way.

  1. In India, there is 1 Extension worker per 800-1000 farmers.
  2. 60% of farmers don’t get any service from Extension workers, according to the NSSO survey.
  3. Farmers depend on the progressive farmer of their area or marketing agent of some company for advice on the product they should use. But the problem is they will suggest only those products which give maximum profits.
  4. There is no lab to farm connectivity i.e. research done in agricultural labs doesn’t always reach the farmers in the field.

Steps taken by the Government for Extension Services
  • The program aims to bolster agricultural extension services throughout India to improve agricultural productivity.
  • The Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) is the key component of the SMAE, which focuses on sharing the latest agricultural technologies with farmers. ATMA is involved in farmer training, demonstrations, exposure visits, kisan melas, mobilisation of farmer groups, and the establishment of farm schools.

These include

  • mKisan
  • PUSA Krishi App

However, app usage is still limited due to literacy issues, regional language limitations, and lack of smartphone access among many small and marginal farmers.


  • Government can’t send the person to each village, but each village has TVs. Hence, the Government of India started Kisan TV in 2015.

  • PMKSK works under the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (announced in 2022)
  • The program aims to convert existing Fertilizer shops into Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samridhi Kendra that will act as a “One Stop Shop” for all agriculture-related inputs (like fertilizers, seeds, insecticides, pesticides, etc.) and other agricultural services.

  • Agriculture Graduates set these up to provide paid advice to farmers on various issues. The Agriculture Ministry and NABARD support this scheme.
  • This also helps generate rural employment for agri-graduates and promotes self-employment in the farm advisory sector.

  • Krishi Vigyan Kendras are set up by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Agricultural Universities for frontline demonstration of agriculture technologies on the field, updating farmers about modern agriculture technologies and providing advisories to farmers using ICT.
  • There are over 700 KVKs in India, but they are often underfunded and lack adequate staff for outreach.

  1. Kisan Call Centre: To address farmers’ queries regarding agriculture and allied sectors.
  2. SMS portal for farmers

  • Under this scheme, the village students are given Agro education.

  • Fairs organized by ICAR to demonstrate new agricultural technologies to farmers.
  • These melas also act as platforms for feedback collection and farmer-scientist interaction.

Farm Insurance

Farm Insurance

This article deals with ‘Farm Insurance.’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


  1. Low Penetration: Only 22% of agricultural land was covered under crop insurance in 2014.  
  2. Low Sums Insured (SI): The sums insured (SI) were low. It was based on the cost of inputs rather than prospective income. 
  3. High Premium: Huge premium was charged. It was as high as 10% of the sums insured.  
  4. Delayed claims settlement: Claims used to lie unclaimed till six months & beyond.
  5. Low Literacy: Farmers don’t know about these schemes and their benefits.
  6. Inadequate Infrastructure: Absence of infra to measure data accurately at farm level.


PMFBY was formulated according to the One Nation–One Scheme theme. It replaced the existing two schemes (i.e. NAIS (National Agricultural Insurance Scheme and Modified NAIS) by removing their inherent drawbacks and incorporating the best features of all previous schemes.


Features of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)
  1. Target: To bring at least 50% cropped area under Insurance Cover.
  2. PMFBY removes any artificial capping of the Sums Insured (SI). The SI will be calculated by multiplying the MSP of a crop by the average seven-year yield for the particular village panchayat area where it is grown.
  3. Uniform premium: Farmers will pay a uniform premium of
    • 2 per cent for all Kharif crops
    • 1.5 per cent for all Rabi crops
    • 5 per cent for annual horticultural and commercial crops.
  4. Governments to fully meet the gap between the actuarial premiums and the rates payable by farmers at Union and State levels. 
  5. Use of Technology: Government will encourage the use of technology, especially mobiles and remote sensing, for quick estimation and early settlement of losses. 
  6. The scheme is extended to cover post-harvest losses as well.
  7. In 2018, the Centre allowed States to set up their own insurance companies for implementing Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). The move came after several requests from states.

  1. Increase in Insured Area: The area insured has reached 610 lakh ha (2023-24), insuring 5.5 crore farmers. PMFBY has become the largest crop insurance scheme in the world in terms of farmer enrolments and the third largest in terms of insurance premiums. It fares well in this regard.
  2. Methodology of Risk Assessment: Earlier, risk assessment was done at the district level, which was later changed to the block level. The Sum Insured (SI) is now measured at the Village level, which is closer to reality.
  3. During the arduous seasons of 2017, 2018 and 2019 marred by weather extremities, the scheme proved to be a decisive factor in securing the livelihoods of farmers, wherein the claims paid ratio in several states averaged more than 100 per cent against the gross premium collected. For example, the States of Chhattisgarh (2017), Odisha (2017), Tamil Nadu (2018), and Jharkhand (2019) received 384 per cent, 222 per cent, 163 per cent and 159 per cent of claims ratio against a gross premium.
  4. To improve the efficacy, the government has started various initiatives under PMFBY. These include
    1. DigiClaim: All the claims are worked out through the National Crop Insurance Portal (NCIP).
    2. CROPIC i.e. Collection of Real-Time Observations and Photo of Crops:  Collect periodic photographs of crops during their life cycle. These photographs validate sown crops and assess crop damage.
    3. Yield Estimation Based on Technology (YES-Tech): It is a technology-based yield estimation mechanism.
    4. Weather Information and Network Data Systems (WINDS): It aims to develop hyper-local weather data by setting intense network of Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) at the block level and Automatic Rain Gauges (ARGs) at the Panchayat level.
  5. Government has also approved the creation of the Fund for Innovation and Technology (FIAT) with the corpus of Rs. 824 crore to fund the technological innovations like YES-TECH, WINDS  etc. and other research and development activities.

  1. The critical factor of analyzing the efficacy of an insurance scheme is the ability to settle its claims quickly. PMFBY failed in this aspect as it took several months to pay compensation to the farmers.
  2. There are allegations of profiteering by Insurance Companies.
  3. It is alleged that most of the increase in insured areas is due to mandatory insurance for loanee farmers. According to the Public Account Committee Report (2023), the percentage of non-loanee farmers is negligible. Additionally, there is poor awareness of the scheme among small and marginal farmers.
  4. PMFBY does not cover tenant farmers.
  5. No governance reforms have been initiated. This scheme is also implemented with the help of rusted old machinery consisting of Patwaris and revenue officers.
  6. Lack of farmer awareness: According to the CAG, out of 5,993 farmers surveyed, only 37% were aware of the schemes.
  7. One-size fits all approach: All the farmers in the country have been treated as similar without any option to choose an insurance that meets the specific needs of their region.
  8. No provision for competitive pricing: As per the scheme guidelines, every cluster has a specific insurance company selling insurances, creating infrastructure and manpower for three years. Lack of competition creates a monopoly over the scheme. 

Due to the above issues, various states are replacing PMFBY with their own insurance schemes. E.g., Jharkhand has started its own insurance scheme (in 2021) called Kisan Fasal Rahat Yojana, which will be implemented by Jharkhand’s Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Co-operative. Gram Sabha has been assigned a major role in accessing crop loss.


The Beed is drought prone district in Maharashtra. The private insurance companies hesitate to do agricultural insurance in the district because many times the insurance claims paid is more than premium collected.

The government has come up with novel solution under which Maharashtra Government has roped in Agriculture Insurance Corporation (AIC) under which the private insurance company will insurance claims upto 110% of premium. On the other hand, if the insurance claims are lesser than 80% of premium, the private insurance company will share part of its profit with AIC.

Agro-Credit

Agro-Credit

This article deals with ‘Agro-Credit.’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


Agri credit is an essential input for agriculture to improve productivity. Access to institutional credit enables the farmer to enhance productivity by investing in machinery, purchasing variable inputs like fertilizers, quality seeds, and manure, and providing funds until the farmer receives payment from the sale of produce.

Every 1% increase in agricultural credit produces a 0.29% increase in agricultural GDP, consequently aiding in the increased income of farmers.


  • Reliance on Informal Sources: 25% of agro-finance still comes from moneylenders. These moneylenders are highly exploitative and charge exorbitant rates.
  • Although the quantity of Short Term Loans has increased, Long Term Investments in agro-infrastructure have decreased, both by the private and public sectors.  
  • Regional Disparity: Coverage is meagre in the northeastern and eastern regions of the country. 
  • Agricultural loans, also known as agri credit, are not used for the stated purpose. Primarily, they are used for marriage & consumption purposes by the farmer.
  • Credit for Small Farmers: Small and Marginal farmers are not covered by banks and other institutional creditors.
  • Banks indulge in coercive actions for repayment, which leads to increased instances of farmer suicides.

Steps taken by government in giving loans to farmers easily
  • Banks are mandated to give 10% of their loans to Agriculture & Allied Sector, and 8% of their loans should be explicitly given to Marginal and Small Farmers.
  • Under this, loans up to ₹ 3Lakh are given to the farmer at an interest rate of 7% & if his credit history is good, then 5% additional subvention is provided by the government, making the effective interest rate of 2%.
  • Government has launched Kisan Rin Portal (KRP) for faster processing of interest subvention under MISS.
  • KCC is a smart debit cum credit card for farmers. The farmer can later pay credit at a very low rate of interest.
  • It was started in 2012. In 2018, the facility was also extended to farmers involved in fisheries and animal husbandry.
  • The scheme aims to reduce farmers’ dependence on the informal banking sector for credit, which can be very expensive and suck them into a debt spiral.
  • Recent reports suggest high default rates on KCCs, which are becoming a significant source of non-performing assets (NPAs) for banks despite their various benefits.
  • As of 2024, banks have issued 7.75 crore KCCs with an outstanding loan of Rs. 9.8 lakh crore.
  • In Budget 2025, the loan limit of KCC was increased to Rs 7 lakh from Rs 5 lakh.
  • Under this scheme, the farmer can deposit his produce in a warehouse & get a warehouse receipt in return. The farmer can “mortgage” this warehouse receipt to a banker to get loans or trade at the Commodity Exchange.
  • Hence, these Negotiable Warehouse Receipt helps the farmer get a loan for the next cropping season on receipt & sell his produce at a later date when he receives a favourable price for his product.  
  • Various state governments are giving loan waivers to the farmers. 
  • But the efficacy of such loan waivers and their impacts on the government’s finances is highly debated.
  • NABARD has started various initiatives for the farm sector, like
    1. NABARD refinances Agro Loans. 
    2. NABARD operates the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund.
  • The Agriculture Ministry runs this scheme.
  • Under this, income support of ₹6,000 / annum is given to all farmers in three instalments of ₹ 2,000 each.

The measures have reduced the share of non institutional credit from 90% in 1950 to 25% in FY22.

Farm Mechanization

Farm Mechanization

This article deals with ‘Farm Mechanization.’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


Farm mechanization refers to the development and use of machines that can take the place of human and animal power in agricultural processes.

Although India is one of the top countries in agricultural production, farm mechanization is just 40% ( & growing at a very slow pace of 5% per annum),  against more than 90% mechanization in the first world. Furthermore, 80% of the value contribution comes from tractors.

Farm Mechanization in India

  • Agricultural Mechanization removes the drudgery associated with agricultural labour, overcomes time and labour bottlenecks to perform tasks within optimum time windows and can influence the environmental footprint of agriculture, leading to sustainable outcomes.
  • Increased Productivity and Reduced Input Costs: The use of proper equipment can increase farm productivity by 30% and reduce the input costs by 20%.
  • Aid in Outward Migration of Educated Youth: Farm mechanization can also aid in the outward migration of educated youth from the farm sector and help them to contribute better in other sectors. 
  • Alternative to deal with the increasing cost of labour: The cost of deploying labour for agriculture operations is increasing substantially. Farm mechanization is the only way to reduce labour costs and, thus, the cost of cultivation. 
  • Improved quality of crops: Mechanized equipment is designed to perform farming operations with precision and accuracy, leading to improved crop quality. 
  • Increased Yields: Machines can uniformly sow seeds, apply fertilizers and pesticides, and harvest crops optimally, leading to better-quality yields.
  • Sustainability: Farm Mechanization can promote sustainable agriculture by reducing the amount of land, water, and energy required for farming operations. 


  • Soil, Terrain & Agro-Climatic Diversity: Machines used in Punjab can’t be used in the Northeast. There is a need for tailor-made products. 
  • Small farmers with limited income can’t buy Tractors.
  • Low Loan Support by the banks to the agriculture sector compared to the Industrial sector.
  • Due to small and fragmented Indian landholdings, it is uneconomical to purchase individual machines.
  • Credit procedure: The procedure to avail agriculture term loan for various activities helping farm mechanization is very cumbersome. Also, the interest rate is higher for such loans than crop loans.

  • It is a sub-part of the Umbrella Green Mission.
  • Aim: Promote agricultural Mechanization among small and marginal farmers.

  • The government of Rajasthan has initiated a scheme that allows small farmers (those with land of less than 2.5 acres) to use tractors and sowing machines without incurring any rent.
  • Yantradoot Scheme of the State of MP provides farm machinery at concessional rates.

  • It was developed by the Agriculture Ministry. It connects farmers and Custom Hiring Service Centres so that farmers can rent agricultural machinery.

  • The initiative targets 15000 Women SHGs, which will be given financial assistance of 80% of the cost of drones so that they can offer drone rental services to farmers for agricultural purposes, including for the application of fertilizers and pesticides.

  • Land Conservation Department offers subsidy of up to 90% to women establishments for purchasing the machines.

  • Higher Agricultural Mechanization has led to higher water usage, stubble burning, smoke from machines and soil erosion, thus impacting the environment negatively. 
  • Higher use of agriculture machines leads to displacement of unskilled labour from the rural areas. 
  • The agricultural tools in the market are not gender friendly. 
  • The agricultural tools are costly, and since the farms are small, they are not utilized to their full potential. 
  • Regional Disparities: Northern India has higher mechanization levels than other regions. (Rice and Wheat crops having the largest extent of mechanization).
  • Farm Mechanization in India is marked by ‘tractorization’.  India’s farm equipment market is 7% of the global market, with more than 80% of the value contribution coming from tractors.

  • Companies and governments should invest in R&D for making machinery suitable for different terrains and agro-climatic regions of India.
  • Cooperative farming: The cooperative group can buy mechanical tools instead of individual farmers.
  • Rental Model: Like ZoomCar for Tractors, Reapers etc., can also be used.
  • Custom Hiring Centers (CHCs)
  • Invent cheap machines suited to Indian conditions. E.g., small farmers can use power tiller instead of tractor and power reaper instead of Combines as they are more affordable, have low operational cost and can be used in rugged topography. 
  • Kisan Drones: Budget 2022 has proposed Kisan Drones for spraying insecticides and pesticides, crop assessment and digitization of land records.

Pesticides (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Pesticides (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


  • 15-25% of the crop in India is lost to weeds, pests, diseases and rodents. 

Statistics of Pesticide Use in India

  • Total pesticide consumption is the highest in Maharashtra, followed by Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. 
  • On the other hand, per-hectare consumption of pesticides is the highest in Punjab.
  • Amongst the crops, paddy accounts for the maximum share of consumption (26-28%), followed by cotton (18-20%).

Pesticides (Agricultural Inputs)

Even though per hectare pesticide is much lower in India (0.5 kg per ha) than in other advanced economies, like 7.0 kg per ha in the USA and 12 kg per ha in Japan. But there are some issues:-

  1. The quality of the spray is substandard.
  2. Farmers use pesticides without following proper guidelines. 
  3. Use of broad-spectrum pesticides, which kill beneficial insects and pollinators as well.
  4. Residues of pesticides are found in fruits and veggies. It leads to a ban on their exports to first-world nations (especially the EU).
  5. When a pesticide is sprayed on crops, most of it bounces off the leaves and falls to the ground. It then mixes with soil and water, contaminating both, and enters the food chain, leading to biomagnification. 
  6. 93 chemicals banned in most of the developed world are sold in India. 
  7. Carcinogenic pesticides like Monsanto’s Glyphosate (brand-named ‘Roundup’) are still sold in India despite the proven fact that it can cause cancer.  
  8. Pesticides like Endosulfan (used on Cashew Plantations in Kerala) have been proven to be genotoxic.
  9. Rising Usage: A warmer climate and growing population are expected to increase the use of pesticides to combat the potential rise in pest invasions and feed a larger population. 
  10. Pesticide Poisoning: According to NCRB, in 2019, 6,962 deaths were reported out of 7,007 pesticide poisoning cases.
  11. Opaque and out-of-date regulatory framework: The Pesticide Management Bill (PMB) has been discussed since 2008. The cabinet approved the latest draft in February 2020.
  12. Private Sector Monopoly: There is a private sector monopoly in pesticide trade whose decision is guided by the profit motive alone. 

  1. Move towards Organic Farming.
  2. Use narrow-spectrum pesticides.
  3. Using biocontrol agents and biopesticides: This method involves controlling pests, such as insects, mites, weeds, and plant diseases, using other organisms. 
  4. Adopt an Integrated Pest Management approach, which encompasses a judicious mix of pest control methods like bio-pesticides, bio-control agents and pesticides. (Vietnam Case Study: In Vietnam, almost all the farmers of the Mekong Delta adopted a policy of “no-spray for the first 40 days”. They used predatory beetles that prey on rice pests.)
  5. The government should pass the Pesticide Management Bill, 2017, which aims to replace the Insecticide Act of 1968 with larger penalties and jail time for selling substandard or fake pesticides. 

Note: India is a signatory to United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) led Stockholm Convention for persistent organic pollutants and Rotterdam convention for export-import of pesticides.  

Fertilizer (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Fertilizer (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


Fertilizer (Agricultural Inputs)

Plants require Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (NPK) for their balanced growth. If soil is deficient in these nutrients or if the farmer is using High Yielding Variety seeds that require more nutrients than any natural soil can supply, different fertilizers are used to boost nutrients in the soil.

NutrientFertilizer used
Nitrogen (N)Urea
Urea is produced using Haber’s Process using LPG as raw material.
It is the most widely consumed fertilizer in India. The Ministry of Chemical and Fertilizer gives subsidies to the Indian companies to manufacture and sell it at a lower price to farmers. 
Phosphorus (P)Diammonium Phosphate (DAP)
80% of its demand is met via imports.   
Potassium (K)Muriate of Potash (MOP)
It is not manufactured in India. Hence, 100% of its demand is met via imports.

Fertilizers are provided to the farmers at subsidized rates. In 2020, Rs 71,000 crore was paid in fertilizer subsidies by the Union Government.

  • Nutrient Based Subsidy is used in the case of DAP & MOP
  • It was framed under Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and issued under Essential. Commodities Act, 1955.
  • The government fixes per kilogram subsidy on DAP & MOP in this system. (Cost of Fertilizer for farmer = Market Price MINUS Fertilizer Subsidy)
  • But, imports of DAP & MOP aren’t controlled.

The case of urea is very different. The government intervenes in the sector in five ways: 

  1. It sets the Maximum Retail Price (MRP).
  2. It provides a subsidy to 30 domestic producers on a cost-plus basis, meaning more inefficient producers get larger subsidies. 
  3. It provides a subsidy to importers.
  4. Imports are canalized—only three agencies can import Urea into India.
  5. Half of the movement of fertilizer is directed—that is, government tells manufacturers where to sell their urea.

These distortions feed upon each other, leading to a series of adverse outcomes.


  • Urea is subsidized 75% of its price. 
  • Due to this, it is smuggled to
    1. Industry (Ammonia-based industry) 
    2. Across the border to Bangladesh and Nepal  
  • Additionally, larger—presumably richer— farmers consume subsidized urea. Ideally, subsidized urea should be given only to poor farmers
  • The regulation under canalization creates shortages. Under the provisions of canalization, the government orders specific companies to when to import, what quantities to import & where to sell. But estimating the demand is a difficult task & shortages can’t be addressed instantaneously (it takes 60 days at least).
  • Earlier, the main objective of the Indian government was self-sufficiency  & this led to Subsidy on Cost Plus Basis, where the subsidy a firm receives is based on its cost of production: greater the cost, the larger the subsidy. Consequently, inefficient firms with high production costs survive, and the incentive to lower costs is blunted.
  • Since Urea is cheaper than other Fertilizers, it creates a situation of urea overuse which is detrimental for the soil. Consequently, the soil’s N:P: K ratio is disturbed (Rajasthan – N:P: K = 25:12:1 instead of 4:2:1). 
  • The declining response ratio or marginal productivity of fertilizers since the 1970s is a pointer to their inefficient use in Indian agriculture.
  • Fertilizer use is leading to harmful effects on the human health such as respiratory diseases, cancer etc.

Steps to rectify Fertilizer Usage
  • Earlier, the government used to give subsidies to the fertilizer company when fertilizer left the company’s godowns. 
  • This system has been changed. Now, Fertilizer companies are paid subsidies only after the retailer has sold the fertilizer to the farmer through a Point of Sale (PoS) device.
  • This system prevents the diversion of subsidized urea towards non-agricultural purposes and smuggling to Nepal and Bangladesh.

  • The scheme aims at marketing fertilizers in the country under ‘Bharat’ brand name.
  • The uniform design of bags across the country will now mention them as ‘Bharat Urea’, ‘Bharat DAP’, ‘Bharat MOP’, ‘Bharat NPK’.
  • Under the scheme
    • The new “Bharat” brand name and PMBJP logo will cover two-thirds of the front of the fertilizer packet.
    • The manufacturing brands can only display their name, logo, and other information on the remaining one-third space.

  • The government started this scheme in 2015.
  • Under this scheme, urea is coated with neem, which has the following benefits
    1. It stops diversion to industrial consumers as neem coated urea cant be used in Ammonia-based industry due to adverse reactions that neem can cause.
    2. It helps in slowing down the Nitrification of urea & increasing the efficacy of urea.
    3. Due to the pesticidal properties of neem, the amount of pesticides required is reduced.   

  • Soil Health Card Scheme is a component of NMSA (National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture).
  • In this, farmer’s land is tested for 12 parameters and given Soil Health Card (updated every 3 years).
  • The card also advises the farmer about the type of crops that can be grown and fertilizer requirements to achieve maximum yield for various crops.  

Importance

  • Assist farmers in supplying proper fertilizer mix, which is currently dominated by urea. 
  • It will help the farmer to select the most appropriate crop pattern.
  • This will lead to a diverse crop pattern that currently revolves around wheat & rice.

  • In 2018, the size of the Urea Bag was reduced to 45 kg instead of earlier 50 kg.
  • Reason: Neem Coated Urea has increased the effectiveness of urea. Since farmers mainly assess the requirement of urea in terms of bags, the government has decided to reduce the size of the bag. 

  • Nano Urea is made by IFFCO.
  • It comes in liquid form and needs to be sprayed on the crop.
  • It is more efficient than normal urea. Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE) of nano urea is over 80% against 30-50% of conventional granular urea. Hence, farmer can achieve the same efficiency by applying lower quantity, thus reducing the overall cost per hectare.
  • Nano Urea’s limitation is that, being a liquid fertiliser, it can only be sprayed after the crop has developed leaves.

  • Urea Gold is developed by Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd.
  • Urea Gold combines urea with sulphur.
  • Benefits
    • Indian soils lack Sulphur and Urea Gold provides Nitrogen and Sulphur as single package.
    • Enhance plant nutrient uptake as coating Urea with Sulphur increases the Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) due to gradual release of Nitrogen.

  • PM PRANAM: PM Program for Restoration, Awareness Generation, Nourishment and Amelioration of Mother-Earth
  • Aim: To reduce the use of fertilizers in the farming
  • The scheme aims to encourage the state governments to reduce the consumption of fertilizers in their state. If state government is successful in reducing the consumption of fertilizers in their state, the Union government will transfer some percentage of the savings in the subsidy bill arising due to decrease in fertilizer consumption as grant.

  • To reduce the cost of imported urea, the Indian government is setting up Joint Ventures with companies of oil rich countries like Oman, where gas prices are low, resulting in cheaper production of fertilizers. 

  • Bringing urea under the NBS program would encourage fertilizer manufacturers to be efficient.

  • Use BAPU (Biometrically Authenticated Physical Uptake) Model for selling urea.
  • Under this model, the government sets the maximum limit on subsidized Urea Bags one can buy. Small farmers will still get all urea at a subsidized rate, but big farmers will have to buy more than the set limit at full price.

  • Use Soil Health Card to make Tailor-made fertilizer for a particular field.

  • Teach farmers about the Integrated Nutrient Management  which uses practices such as organic manures, plantation of legume crops, crop residue management etc.

Organic Alternatives to Fertilizers
  • Manure is a natural substance made by the decomposition of organic waste.
  • Apart from nutrients, it also provides humus to the soil.
  • But manure is less rich in nutrients compared to fertilizers.
  • The government is promoting the use of manure via schemes like
    1. Gobar Dhan Yojana: For converting cattle dung and solid waste from farms and fields to manure, biogas and Bio-CNG (India has 300 million cows generating 3 million tons of dung).
    2. City Compost Scheme: Fertilizer companies and marketing entities will also co-market City Compost with chemical fertilizers.

  • Vermicompost is a mixture of earthworms and decomposed foodleading to the breakdown of organic matter.
  • Benefits of Vermicompost:
    1. Increase in soil aeration by earthworms.
    2. Enriches soil with microorganisms.
    3. Water retention of soil capacity increases.
    4. Easy to produce at an affordable cost.

Biofertilizer uses Micro-Organisms to produce impact similar to Fertilizers. Eg

  1. Rhizobium Bacteria for Nitrogen Fixation.
  2. Mycorrhiza Fungi for Phosphorus.

Water and Irrigation (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Water and Irrigation (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


  • Water is a critical input for successful agriculture. This water can be provided naturally through rainfall or artificially through human efforts. 
  • Irrigation is the process of supplying water to the crops by artificial means such as canals, wells, tubewells, tanks, etc., from freshwater sources such as rivers, tanks, ponds, or underground reserves.


  • India has 18% of the world population but just 4% of freshwater resources. Hence, freshwater is a scarce resource in India. 
  • 55% of India’s total area under agriculture has irrigation facilities & the rest 45% is rainfed.
Water and Irrigation (Agricultural Inputs)
  • There are regional disparities in irrigation facilities. While Punjab, Tamil Nadu and UP have more than 50% of agricultural land under irrigation, other states like Maharashtra and Rajasthan have less than 50%.
  • Due to lower levels of irrigation,
    1. Indian agriculture is vulnerable to the vagaries of nature. E.g., due to El-Nino induced drought conditions in 2014, the agriculture growth rate dipped to -0.2%. 
    2. Farmers can’t grow multiple crops, reducing the overall productivity of farms and farmers. 

  • The Ministry of Agriculture launched it in 2015.
  • It is a core scheme in which the Union give some funds, and the rest of the funds are to be provided by the states. 
  • It aims to bring 2.85 million hectares of agricultural land under irrigation.

3 objectives to be achieved under PMKSY

Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana
  • Increase Irrigated Area so that every farm gets an irrigation facility.
  • It is to be achieved through Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Program (AIBP). 
  • Improve the efficiency of water usage by promoting Micro-Irrigation.
  • E.g., Drip Irrigation, Sprinkler Irrigation etc.
  • Financial assistance is provided at 55% of the total project cost for small and marginal farmers, and 45% for other farmers for installation of micro irrigation

It includes

  • Setting up Water Harvesting Structures like check dams, tanks etc.
  • Conserve Soil Moisture
  • Ground Water Recharge
  • Municipal Water Treatment and re-use

  • River inter-linking project must be completed to transfer water from water surplus basins to water-deficit basins.
  • Electricity subsidies for tubewells should be eliminated as they encourage the wastage of water.
  • Pulse cultivation should be encouraged in drought-prone areas.
  • There should be cost-based water pricing, and canal water theft should be dealt with strictly.
  • Rainwater Harvesting should be encouraged to capture and store rainwater.
  • Watershed Management should be promoted for the recharge of surface and groundwater.

Seeds (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Land (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


  • High-yielding varieties (HYV) of seeds are one of the most crucial factors for enhancing agricultural productivity. 20-25% of farm productivity relies on seed quality. 
  • But the issue with HYV seeds is that they need to be replaced every year for the best results. It is not possible in India because
    1. Farmers are poor, and they can’t afford to buy HYV seeds.
    2. Due to infrastructural issues, HYV seeds of the best quality aren’t available to meet the demand of all farmers.
  • As a result, India’s Seed Replacement Ratio (SRR) is low, and most farmers use farm-saved seeds.
Seeds (Agricultural Inputs)

  • SRR is the percentage of sown area covered by the certified seeds rather than the farm-saved seeds. 
  • In India, SRR is low, varying between 20-35% for various seeds.


Quality Seeds are of the following types

  • Breeder seeds are produced in laboratories either by ICAR, Agricultural Universities, or MNCs like Monsanto.
  • These seeds can be High Yielding Variety (HYV) or Genetically Modified (GM) Seed.

  • Breeder seeds can’t be produced on a large scale. Hence, the industry produces Foundation seeds from Breeder seeds at a large scale.
  • In the government sector, National Seeds Corporation produces the Foundation Seeds using Breeder Seeds made by ICAR or Agricultural Universities.

  • Foundation seeds are then distributed in villages to large farmers and Farmer Producer Organisations. They use foundation seeds to produce certified seeds.

Breeder, Foundation and Certified Seeds are collectively called Quality Seeds.

They are better than Farm Saved Seeds because, according to Mendel’s Laws, dominant genes will dominate in the next generation, and the efficacy of seeds reduces.


HYV seeds can either be Hybrid Seeds or Genetically Modified Seeds. The difference between them is as follows:-

Hybrid SeedsHybrid Seeds are developed by cross-breeding or cross-pollination with other plants.
GM SeedsGM Seeds are developed by transferring selected genes from one organism into another.
E.g., In BT Cotton, a gene from bacteria named Bacillus Thuringenesis (BT) is transferred to cotton so that it can produce natural pesticides to kill the insects and pests.
  • HYV seeds have a higher yield and productivity than ordinary seeds.
  • HYV has a shorter life cycle, allowing farmers to venture for multiple cropping.
  • Per quintal requirement of irrigation is lower in the case of HYVs.
  • It increases the income of farmers. Per hectare income of farmers increases significantly by using HYV seeds.


  • India has a low Seed Replacement Ratio and high use of farm-saved seeds, negatively impacting farm productivity. 
  • Low investment in R&D by Seed Companies: Investment in R&D is just 3-4% of profits against the international norm of 10-12%.
  • India has a weak IPR regime to protect the rights of seed companies. Hence, companies are not interested in investing in India.
  • The efficacy of certified seeds is also doubtful in many cases.  
  • Seed Monopoly IssuesMonsanto and other MNCs indulge in seed monopolization. It has become the cause of farmer suicides in Vidarbha.
  • Issue of Terminator Genes: Seed companies use Terminator genes in the GM seeds. Such seeds can be used only once and lose their vigour next season. In this way, farmers are forced to buy expensive seeds every season. 
  • Issue of Trait Fees: Under the Indian Patent Act, Seed companies can’t patent particular seed and plant varieties. But companies like Monsanto can charge Trait Fees if other companies use their technology to produce the seeds. BT Cotton is produced by Indian Seed Companies using Monsanto’s Bollgard technology, and in return, Indian seed companies pay a type of royalty to Monsanto, called Trait Fees. The government of India decides the ceiling on Trait fees. But the government has no fixed policy in this regard, causing many legal issues.
  • Loss of genetic diversity of seeds as local varieties have not been preserved. 

Land (Agricultural Inputs)

This article deals with ‘Land (Agricultural Inputs).’ This is part of our series on ‘Economics’ which is an important pillar of the GS-3 syllabus. For more articles, you can click here.


  • India has 18% of the world’s population but 2.5% of the world’s land. Hence, land is a scarce resource in India. 
  • Net sown area in India is 141 million hectares out of India’s total geographical area of 368 million hectares.
  • Due to the tradition of equal division of land among heirs each passing generation, the issue of small-sized farms and land fragmentation has come to the forefront.
    • The average size of farm holdings has declined from 2.3 hectares in 1970-71 to 1.08 hectares in 2015-16 to 0.512 hectares in 2019 (SAS,2021)
Average Household Land Ownership Trends in India
  • The distribution of land is not a consolidated one, but its nature is fragmented. Different tracts have different levels of fertility, and it is distributed accordingly. If there are four tracts to be distributed between two sons, both sons will get smaller plots from all four tracts. Hence, landholdings have become fragmented.
  • According to Situation Assessment Survey, 2021 (SAS, 2021), 86% of agricultural household ownerships are small and marginal while just 0.1% are large.
Land (Agricultural Inputs)

Agricultural holdings are classified into three categories:

Economic HoldingHolding which ensures a minimum satisfactory standard of living in a family.
Family HoldingHolding which gives work to an average size family having one plough.
Optimum HoldingMaximum size of the holding which must be possessed and owned by a family


  • Land Consolidation: Reallocation of holdings to create farms comprising only one or a few parcels instead of many patches. However, all states have passed such legislations, but it has been implemented only in Punjab, Haryana and some parts of UP. 
  • Land Leasing: Union has circulated the Model Land Leasing Act providing security to the owner of land against illegal occupation by a tenant farmer. Provisions of the Model Land Leasing Act will encourage owners of land who have moved to some other sector for employment to lease their land to tenant farmers for cultivation. 

Administrative Relations between Center and States

Administrative Relations between Center and States

This article deals with ‘Administrative Relations between Center and States – Indian Polity.’ This is part of our series on ‘Polity’ which is important pillar of GS-2 syllabus. For more articles , you can click here


Division of Executive Powers

Executive powers are divided on the lines of Legislative powers

Executive powers between the Center and the States mirror the delineation of legislative powers:

Executive Power of the Center:

Executive Power of the Center extends to the following

  1. To all matters on which it can Legislate 
  2. To exercise rights, authority & jurisdiction conferred on it by Treaty or Agreement

Executive Power of the States

Executive Power of the States extends to the following

  1. To all matters on which States can legislate,
  2. On matters enumerated in the Concurrent list except when it is specifically mentioned for the centre

The Center can give directions to States in the following.

  1. Executive Power of the Union shall extend to giving such directions to the State as may appear to the Government of India necessary for the purpose of compliance with laws made by Parliament.
  2. To construct or maintain communication declared of national or military importance
  3. Measures to be taken for the protection of railways within the State
  4. To provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother language to minority groups
  5. Drawing up & executing specific schemes for SC & ST in the State

The Government of India bears costs incurred on functions #1, 2 and 3.


Mutual Delegation of Functions

It can be under two conditions.

Agreement

  • President may, with the consent of the State government, entrust to that government any of the executive functions of the Center.
  • The Governor of a State may, with the consent of the Central government, entrust to that government any of the executive functions of the State.

Legislation

  • The Center can entrust its Executive function to the State without the State’s consent by making provisions about it in the Act itself (the Constitution confers this power to Parliament)

All India Services

Administrative Relations between Center and States
  • Centre and States have their separate Public Services, but in addition, there are All India Services, which include IAS, IPS & IFS (IFS was created later in 1966)
  • According to Article 312, Parliament can create any new All India Services with the resolution passed by the Rajya Sabha for this.
  • These services are unique in representing a single cadre with common rights and a uniform pay scale. This distinctive feature ensures a standardized and cohesive administrative framework, contributing to the overall efficiency of governance.
  • States have immediate control, while the Center has ultimate control over them.
  • Although they violate the principle of federalism, they were supported on grounds like maintaining high standards in administration, helping to ensure uniformity in administration, and facilitating liaison, cooperation & coordination.

Integrated Judicial System

  • Although India has a federal structure consisting of a dual polity, when it comes to the administration of justice, our Constitution advocates for the establishment of an Integrated Judicial System.
  •  Such integration intends to foster a cohesive legal framework that upholds the principles of justice, equality, and fairness for all citizens.

Relations during Emergencies

Done in emergency provisions (Click here )


Extra Constitutional Measures

Several advisory bodies and conferences are held at the Central level.

  • Niti Ayog, National Integration Council, North Eastern Council, Central Council of Indian Medicine, Central Council of Homeopathy, etc., are some of the Advisory bodies which help both states & centres to streamline policies.
  • Conferences – Chief Ministers Conference(Presided by PM), Governors Conference (Presided by President), Chief Secretaries Conference( Presided by Cabinet Secretary), etc. to facilitate Centre-State consultation on a wide range of matters