Issue of Poverty
This article deals with the ‘Issue of Poverty.’ This is part of our series on ‘Governance’ and ‘Economics’ series, which is an important pillar of the GS-2 and GS-3 syllabus respectively. For more articles, you can click here
What is Poverty?
Poverty is a social concept which results due to unequal distribution of benefits of socio-economic progress.
How does it manifest itself?
Poverty manifests itself in the following ways
- Hunger & Malnutrition
- Lack of access to education and health care
- Social Discrimination
- Lack of participation in decision making
World Bank definition
World Bank defines extreme and moderate poverty in the following way
|Extreme poverty||Living on less than $ 1.25 per day.|
|Moderate poverty||Living on less than $ 2 per day.|
Note – Poverty is measured in Purchasing Power Parity(PPP) exchange rate & not absolute exchange rate.
- It measures the Depth of poverty
- It is also called Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Index.
Engel Law states that when incomes rises, percentage of overall income spent on food items decreases. This is known as ENGEL’S LAW.
SDG & Poverty
- Sustainable Development Goals gives utmost importance to poverty. The First SDG talks about ending poverty in all its forms everywhere by 2030.
- India is home to 26% of the global extreme poor. Hence, the Indian role in achieving that goal is most important.
Causes of Poverty
- Growth Model not conducive to poverty alleviation: India chose a capital-intensive model in a labour-intensive country, which was a great fault.
- Widespread reliance on agriculture (42% population is dependent on sector contributing 17% to the GDP)
- Lack of formal institutional credit pushes a large number of Indians into poverty every year.
- MATTHEW EFFECT: The phenomenon, widely spread across advanced welfare states that the middle class tends to be the primary beneficiary of social benefits & services targeted to the poor (India is trying to rectify this using Targeted Delivery of Subsidy with the help of Jan Dhan-Aadhar-Mobile).
- Rapid Population growth in India is also the primary cause of poverty as enough resources were not available for all.
- Caste system: The subordination of low caste people by the high caste people caused poverty of the former.
- Joint family system: Joint Family System, followed by many families in India, provides social security to its members. As a result, some people take undue advantage of it and live upon the income of others. They become idlers. Their routine of life consists in eating, sleeping and begetting children.
- Social Customs: Ruralites spend a large percentage of annual earnings on social ceremonies like marriage, death feasts etc., which force them to take debt and remain trapped in poverty.
- Drought, Floods, Cyclones etc. perpetuate poverty.
- Historical reasons such as colonialism & imperialism led to the exploitation of Indian people. India’s wealth was drained to metropole Britain for two centuries.
- Withdrawal of Government from Social Security, especially after LPG Reforms.
- Anti-poverty schemes are not successfully implemented due to institutional inadequacies.
What is Poverty Line?
- The poverty line is the threshold income and households earning below this threshold are considered poor.
- Different countries define the poverty line in different ways depending on local socio-economic needs.
Different approaches to define the poverty line
There are two approaches regarding this
- Nutritional Approach: It is based on specific minimum criteria of nutrition intake
- Relative Deprivation Approach: It doesn’t take into account just nutritional deficits, but in comparison to the progressive section, the person is not that progressed. E.g., a person earning less than 60% of the country’s per capita income
Developing countries generally follow the nutritional Approach. But now the time has come that India should move from the Nutritional Approach to the Relative Deprivation Approach to ensure sustainable and equitable development.
Poverty line in India is decided by
- Earlier it was used to be determined by erstwhile Planning Commission
- Now NITI Aayog determines the Poverty Line. NITI Aayog made the Commission under Arvind Panagariya recommend Poverty Line in India.
- Panagariya has suggested that
- Tendulkar Committee’s report should be accepted for poverty line estimation.
- But socio-economic indicators, say, as collected by Socio-Economic Caste Census, should be used to determine entitlement for benefits.
Various Committees constituted for Poverty Line Determination
In books, we frequently come across the Poverty Line defined as 2400 calories in Rural & 2100 calories in Urban. This definition of the Poverty Line was based on the recommendations of the Lakdawala Committee (1999).
Tendulkar Committee defined Poverty Line based on per capita monthly expenditure.
While calculating, Tendulkar Committee based its recommendation on food, health, education and clothing.
According to Tendulkar Committee Report, Poverty has declined in India from 37.2% in 2004 to 22% in 2011.
C Rangarajan Committee
C Rangarajan Committee defined Poverty Line based on Monthly Expenditure of family of five.
Rangarajan Committee took more things than Tendulkar Committee into its calculations
Rangarajan Committee also recommended delinking the Poverty line from the Government entitlement benefits. Food Security benefits should be given as per Social and Caste dimensions and not BPL.
Side Topic: Saxena Committee on Rural Poverty (2009)
- When Tendulkar Committee Report came, the Ministry of Rural development hurriedly set up a committee known as the SAXENA COMMITTEE in 2009 to review the methodology for inclusion of a person in the BPL Category to include them in government schemes.
Recommendation of the Committee
Committee gave the famous Automatic Inclusion and Automatic Exclusion principle.
- The automatic inclusion criterion for the most vulnerable sections of society (E.g. homeless people, persons with disabilities etc.)
- Automatic Exclusion: Those having motorbikes etc.
- Apart from being Automatically included, find other using scores of various deprivations.
Side Topic: Hashim Committee on Urban Poverty (2012)
- To suggest a methodology for inclusion of a person in the BPL category in Urban Areas to include them in government schemes.
- Automatic Exclusion
- Automatic Inclusion
- Scoring Index: remaining households will be assigned scores from 0 to 12 based on various indicators. They should be considered eligible for inclusion in the BPL List in the increasing order of higher scores.
Multidimensional Poverty Index
- In India, we calculate poverty using Tendulkar Method based on household consumption.
- But UNDP takes a holistic view of poverty and measure it differently.
- The report has been released since 2010.
- In Multidimensional Poverty, they look into the following components to measure poverty (HES)
- Health with components like child mortality
- Education with components like years of schooling
- Standard of Living with components like Electricity, water etc.
Value Addition: Capability Approach to Poverty by Amartya Sen
- Poverty is defined by an individual’s income.
- E.g., Extreme Poverty is defined as those who live on $1.25 per day or less.
- As a result, following this approach, governments centre their Poverty Removal Policies on job creation, GDP growth and other economic policies.
- In richer countries, all are fortunate enough that they can earn a good income. Does that mean they are not poor?
- Amartya Sen’s Capability approach defines poverty in a Holistic Way. A better approach to look at poverty is the deprivation of a person’s capabilities to live the life they value.
Critique of these Poverty Lines
- Experts argue that the Indian way of calculating poverty is incorrect. It is simply what some call a “starvation line”. Critics argue that governments around the world keep the poverty line at low levels to show that millions have been moved out of poverty.
- India should be using some relative measure as opposed to the absolute measure to define poverty. In most Europe, a family with a net income of less than 60% of the “median net disposable income” is counted as poor. A poverty line “relative” to the national average also gives an idea about the state of inequality.
- A comparison shows that India’s poverty line is abysmally low than even African Poverty Lines. Even the poverty line of Rwanda is higher than that of India. The per capita poverty line of a rural adult Rwandan in Indian terms comes out to be Rs. 900/ month, more than Rs. 816 for a person in rural India.
- Another critique that Poverty Line faces is that once decided, the PL remains the same for years & don’t take into account inflation. It needs to be updated every year by applying a cost inflation index to keep it realistic.
- Multidimensional Poverty Index: We define poverty in a minimal way by just looking at household consumption. UNDP defines poverty using the Multidimensional Poverty Index, which takes a holistic view and considers indicators like Health, Education, and Standard of Living. India should move toward that.
Reduction of Poverty in India
According to Tendulkar Committee Report, poverty in India has reduced from 37.2% in 2004 to 22% in 2011.
Reduction in poverty is attributed to
- Increase in employment in the non-agriculture sector – The construction sector absorbed the landless labourers & daily wage earners from villages
- Schemes like MGNREGA, National rural livelihood mission also reduced the stress during the lean season by creating employment opportunities during the non-agricultural season.
- India’s demographic bulge provided more working population compared to dependents (Children and elders).
- Social welfare schemes like PDS, AAY, MGNREGA, NRLM, Pension schemes and others provided a safety net to the poor
- Inward remittances – Large emigration of the citizen to the US, EU etc. and to west Asian destinations like UAE, Saudi, Qatar etc. generated huge inward remittances for India, which directly benefited dependents in India
- Quality jobs in the Service sector like BPO, Hospitality, Retail chain, E-commerce supply chain provided heavy wages.
- The rapid growth of the economy provided better opportunities to come out of poverty through better employment opportunities, increased demand for services etc.
Impact of LPG Reforms on Poverty
- Poverty has decreased: Consider any Poverty Line, all points to the fact that Poverty in India has declined. Take the example of the extreme poverty line as defined by the World Bank.
- Inequality: Inequality in India has increased after LPG Reforms.
The rich section has reaped the benefits of LPG Reforms. This is the leading cause of the increase in Inequality.
The above Paradox can be explained by the Redistribution of Income by Government. Because of the increase in income of richer sections, the government is getting more taxes. Therefore, redistribution of this source has ensured that Poverty has decreased.
Impact of Poverty
Several issues like hunger, illness and thirst are both causes and effects of poverty. Hence, the term known as poverty trap is usually used for this i.e. bad cycle is created not allowing people to come out of poverty
|On Society||Poverty results in inequalities which can culminate into violent upheavals like Arab Spring. Various Revolutions in Arab Spring started because of the lack of jobs and high poverty levels.|
|On Children||Poverty leads children to build antisocial behaviour and social exclusion.|
|Terrorism||Most of the time terrorists do come from poor countries with high unemployment.|
|Diseases||Diseases are very common in people living in poverty because they lack the resources to maintain a healthy living environment.|
|Education||Those living below the poverty line cannot attend schools and create a vicious cycle in which poverty prevents people from getting a good education, and being uneducated prevents them from escaping poverty.|
How can India reduce poverty?
Even though India has grown rapidly, its growth has been less effective at reducing poverty than in some of India’s middle-income peers such as China, Vietnam, Brazil and Turkey. The following can be done in this respect.
In Agricultural sector
With 4 out of every 5 of India’s poor living in rural areas, progress will need to focus on the rural poor. Hence, the government should focus on following to increase the income of those involved in the agriculture sector.
- Value addition through food processing
- Organic farming
- Cooperation farming, milk cooperatives, and farmer producer organizations.
In Manufacturing sector
Create Jobs in India via
- Skill development
- Make in India
- Startup India
In Service sector
- Creation of quality jobs in BPO, IT and ITES for youth
- Promotion of tourism
- Promotion of higher job creation in e-commerce, supply chain, Hospitality and construction sectors.
- Implement Jan Dhan- Aadhar- Mobile (JAM) effectively to target subsidy to the poor and eliminate inclusion and exclusion errors.
- Look into the feasibility of providing Universal Basic Income.